Wednesday, June 6, 2012

What Must A Court Consider Before Sentencing Someone to Death? Eddings v. Oklahoma (1982)

Once a person has been convicted of a crime, the court proceedings move into the sentencing phase. The judge or a jury must decide the appropriate sentence for the crime, and there are legal parameters that must be followed. For example, a Class 4 Felony in Colorado carries a potential prison sentence of two to six years.

Sentences can then be lengthened based on aggravating factors, such as whether the person has committed an "extraordinary risk" crime or an "aggravated" crime. Sentences can also be lengthened if the person is deemed a "habitual offender." Other aggravating factors might include a diagnosis of Antisocial Personality Disorder or psychopathy.

A judge or a jury may be inclined to lean more toward the minimum end of the sentencing range if there are mitigating factors. For example, a person who assaulted someone in a parking lot might get a more lenient sentence if the judge understands that person has a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder and was extremely depressed and angry at the time of the assault because he needed to stop taking his medications due to side effect issues. These mitigating factors don't completely excuse the person from wrongdoing, but they help explain to the judge why the person probably deserves a more lenient punishment.

In January of 1982, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a landmark decision regarding what type of mitigating evidence must be considered prior to sentencing a person to death. The case is Eddings v. Oklahoma.

Mr. Eddings was a 16 year-old "youth, raised without proper guidance, subjected to excessive physical punishment, and emotionally disturbed in general." He ran away from home with several friends and ended up shooting and killing a highway patrol officer. Mr. Eddings was tried as an adult in Oklahoma and convicted of first-degree murder.

The trial court and another lower court both considered Mr. Eddings' age as the only mitigating factor prior to sentencing him to death, thus ignoring his emotional disturbance and violent family background. Mr. Eddings argued ignoring that evidence violated his Eighth Amendment (Cruel and Unusual Punishment) and Fourteenth Amendment (Due Process) Rights.

The Supreme Court agreed with Mr. Eddings' legal argument. They concluded the lower courts made a mistake by not taking into account all potential mitigating evidence, including evidence regarding Mr. Eddings' background and mental health. The Court concluded, "While these [mitigating] circumstances did not suggest an absence of responsibility for the crime, they had to be considered in sentencing."

Because of the Eddings v. Oklahoma ruling, sentencing phases of death penalty cases can be very long, and often forensic psychologists are hired by the defense in an attempt to find mitigating evidence that might lower a sentence from Death to Life in Prison. The Court must consider all of that mitigating evidence prior to making its decision regarding the sentence.

Thanks for reading-- Max Wachtel, Ph.D.


There are several girls right now whom tag heuer replica watches additional regarding the relevance with their various other necklaces -- wedding rings, rings and the like -- that they can forget about to view the significance in the women platinum enjoy. Platinum designer watches showcase a new dressy clothing using favor along with classiness. Your very small platinum hermes replica along with smaller rounded people using superb refined for the arms in the enjoy develop this critical portion of a new female's clothing, it is just a speculate precisely why many people miss precisely how wonderful these kind of very small swiss wrist watches might be. Your sparkle involving women platinum rolex replica sale can be not bettered, along with his or her stand out could bring in a person via through the place. That they sparkle inside lighting, setting up a shimmer pertaining to people. Quite renowned along with known platinum enjoy designers including Patek Philippe, Vacheron Constantin, Girard-Perregaux get a lot of designer watches which could charge just as much as 190, 000 us dollars for every enjoy, nevertheless never fret, you will not should commit lots of to acquire an acceptable one particular. Cartier hublot replica watches could manage via 2-3, 000 us dollars for you to approximately virtually 50, 000. Movado is incredibly effectively well known in the industry involving designer watches and possesses designer watches that will start off all-around 190 us dollars which enable it to manage way up in the countless numbers. Consequently, the thing is that, you'll not hublot replica uk a lot of cash to acquire an outstanding women platinum enjoy.

While you are seem to find these binoculars for ones cherished a particular you'll uncover which the field sunglasses are notable aided by the magnifier replica Breguet watches number which may be accompanied by a good "x". As most certainly as combined with the magnifier range also, there are created a second amount that might reveal in regards to the volume from light which the binocular prism allows to get in. Those only two figures are actually of value contained in the acquisition of long fake Breitling watches distance scopes. It happens to be peaceful clean replica Rado and acceptable your magnifying range since it simply just informs us which may how much the typical eye-sight are generally zoomed out of your long travel time scopes. Alternatively if your primary 2nd range of the binocular could be reduced therefore this awareness in your long travel time scopes is influenced by faux montres omega the lamps appearing with the lens. The larger how much the higher is cheap Replica Amorosa Watches UK the rankings.

Post a Comment


Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More